Drug Testing in the Workplace Essay -- Pre-Employment Drug Testing

Drug test has become a very freehand issue for many companies. Approximately eighty-one percent of companies in the linked States administer do drugs testing to their employees. Of these, seventy-seven percent of companies test employees prior(prenominal) to employment. Even with the commonality of drug testing, it is still a practice that is princip every(prenominal)y limited to larger corporations which have the financial stability, as well as the human resources to effectively carry out a drug testing program. In the United States, it is suggested that as many as 70 percent of drug users are employed. Now this is a huge chunk, but as a result of drug testing, these big corporations have a significantly lower percentage of the employed drug users on their workforce. Inversely, sensitive to small companies tend to have more. United States companies, who employ more than five 100 workers, employ only 1.3 percent of the employed drug users, while medium size companies, empl oying only 25 to five hundred employees, have 43 percent of the employed drug users on their payroll, and smaller companies, with fewer than twenty-five employees, provide jobs for the remaining 44 percent. Now, why is it important for companies to perform drug tests? First, drug users are a third less productive than the comely employee, and tend to take more sick days. They are almost tetrad times more likely to feat an on the job accident and injure themselves as well as someone else. They are in any case five times more likely to injure themselves outside of the workplace, which in turn affects both performance and attendance. Now I?m certain(p) almost everyone can attest to the fact that drugs, including alcohol can cause some serious injuries. A study by the United States postal Service found that substance abusers, when compared to their non-substance abusing co-workers, are involved in 55 percent more accidents, and sustain 85 percent more on the job injuries? (Why Dr ug visitation). Another study conducted by the National Council reports that ?80 percent of those injured in ?serious? drug-related accidents at work are not the drug abusing employees but non-using co-workers and others? (Why Drug Test). All of these facts relate back to the public duty of the employers to provide a safe work purlieu for all of their employees. Companies also want to create a safe, productive work environment in order ... ...Spring 2002.8.) Bryan Jr., Leslie A. ?Drug Testing in the Workplace.? Professional Safety. Oct. 2010. 9.) Pryweller, Joseph. ?Insurers, States, set up Incentives for Testing.? Plastics News. 18 June 2001.10.) Professional Services of America. Drug Free Workplace Policy.11.) Bixby, Michael Dudley-Beck, Caryn Cihon, Patrick. The juristic Environment ofBusiness. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2001.12.) unequivocal Court Reporter October Term 2009 Volume 109 A. West Publishing order St. Paul, Minnesota, 2009.13.) ?Drug Testin g in the Workplace.? The American Civil Liberties Union. http//www.aclu.org/library/pbp5.html. 21 May 2002.14.) Daniels, Susan. ?Drug-testing Cuts Accident Costs Study.? National Underwriter (Property and Casualty/ chance and Benefits Management Edition v. 101). 23 June 2007.15.) Elkin, Sam. ?How to Establish a Drug-free Workplace.? occupational Hazards v.61. March 2011.16.) Thatcher, Mike. ?Chemical Warfare.? People Management. 24 Oct. 2010.17.) ?Why Drug Test Laboratory Corporation of America 2003