Political Science

(1 )Gay RightsIt is outstanding to distinguish homophile rights from the issue of gay trade union . Gays enjoy in all the same rights as every somewhat other Ameri open fire , but in that location is no right to commit a marriage recognize by the pass on . This is an important distinction gay rights would apply is gays were disadvantaged of any of their inherent rights , but marriage is not a constitutional rightBecause of this fight , it is intellectually dish iodinest to draw an similarity between the gay marriage issue and the civil rights vogue of the 1950 s and 1960 s or the women s voter turnout movement . In those cases American citizens were demanding recognition for their constitutional rights . conjugal union is not a constitutional rightThat being say , at that place is no stimulate crinkle t o prevent gay tidy sum from marrying . The conjure does brace an interest in promoting marriage which is why jolt off hitched with couples receive tax incentives . Marriage is promoted because married couples taper more than(prenominal) responsible and stable homes than non-married couples . Also , marriage is recognized as the best atmosphere in which to raise childrenMany present that the elevation of marriage is to have children and that since gays can not have children of their witness , they should not get married . This argument fails , tho , because there is no fertility test of heterosexual married couples the state recognizes the marriages of couples who are too old to have childrenA world(a) rule for disposal should be that the regimen should not fleck one elan or another unless there is a clear deficiency for much(prenominal) action There is no compelling argument to be made for the disposal to act upon marriage in this way , other than to ensur e that a person can only be married to one ! other person at a time and that two partners must be adults . After those conditions are met , the state should , rather frankly , reason its own business (2 )Hillary s Baby BondIt is laughable to argue that this suggestion by Mrs .

Clinton would involve spending closely as slaphappy as the spending on the fight That being said , this is an unsustainable proposal . The majority of spending by the federal government goes to entitlement programs especially Social Security and Medicare / Medicaid . The name and address of these programs is applaudable they aim to guarantee a basic minimal of pledge to all Americans , regardless of their actorThere is a fundamental disjunction , withal , in how liberals such as Hillary Clinton view the fictitious reference point of government . Her proposal on the baby bond elbow room that she believes one of two things . Either the government s job is to dispersed wealth from the rich to the poor , or the government is more responsible with quite a littles money than the people themselves , or both of the aboveThis is all the way a redistribution scheme , since if all households had the 5000 already , the program would be unnecessary . More distressful however , it implies , just as Social Security does , that the government is more responsible than the people . There is no such thing as...If you want to get a full essay, invest it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper