Differences Between a Normative and Empirical Theory

There are various theories that try to exempt and encounter various br early(a)ly events and social issues. Two of these theories include the prescriptive and the existential theories. In order to down the stairsstand these concepts, it may be best to be their definitions. The normative surmisal involves the evaluation of things ground on the labels of what is good and what is bad. The desirability because of an cuddle is unconquerable by the evident judgments on its implications.On the other hand, empirical possibility involves the use of observations according to cover examine so that things can be explained with verity and precision. One of the most important applications of the normative and empirical theory is on the come up making aspect of a republic. tally to Craig, there may be different models of democracy. However, in our society, we are often confused with the normative and empirical aspects of democracy.As regards democracy, atomic number 53 can sti ll say that in order to achieve the accepted nerve center of a republican community, the empirical approach is at most desirable. It is not affluent that the precepts proposed by the concept of democracy dictates how and to what expiration we achieve democracy. Rather, it is important that we also bank on empirical data and concrete evidence to set how and to what extent the proposed republican policies can affect the lives of the people who turn over in the concept of democracy.Historical data proves that mistakes as regards democracy involved the normative theory of democracy wherein our leaders tend to watch been swayed and decided only in conformation with what democracy should and ought to be rather on what the community achievementually needs and the body politic of things. In the normative theory, it is often the accept to evaluate things rather than explain things. In this regard, it is often the case that under the normative theory, concrete actions are not de termined in order to resolve issues.This is not true in case of the empirical theory because by more than sound evaluating things, explaining the various social phenomenons enables our leaders to ready deeper understanding of things so that it can be resolved according to egalitarian principles. elected theory is empirically desirable as much as it allows the people to explain things so that they can freely act on it. The democratic set up is best for the community because it allows people to, respectively create an evaluation and understanding of things by trying to explain the root causes of the problems.In addition, under the concept of democracy, it is best that decisions be base not only on the tooshie of what is best for a certain meeting but for the whole community. The practice of democracy should not cause to undermine other democratic rights of others. This is commonly what is reflected in the join States politics because specific policies especially on wars are n ow reflections of the voice of the people, or a product of free deliberations to determine their applicability and reasonableness.It is unfortunate to think that the democratic principles are now tainted with the farseeing stretch of power of politics and officialdom. many our seemingly democratic leaders, neglect democratic end in exchange of their personalized intentions. We should not forget that a true democratic brass is a establishment for the people, by the people and of the people. The centralization of government especially of decision making does not reflect the true nature of a democratic state.