Genetically Modified Food Essay

Genetically special (GM) victualss atomic number 18 ethically unacceptable. GM solid foods atomic number 18 food product derived in whole or part from a genetically modified existence by human intention. It is a special set of technologies that concerns the alteration, deletion, or asset of the genetic makeup of living organisms a great deal(prenominal) as animals, plants, or bacteria.This is an meaning(a) issue because GM foods make been dubbed as the feed of the Future and although studies suffer come come to the foren that genetically modified foods may bring about many a(prenominal) benefits to mankind, we essential(prenominal) in addition look into the ethical issues involved in producing such food before we even consider accepting it as the centering of the future. First, we must understand that the word ethical is defined as having to do with morals or morality or of con fixing to moral standards.There bequeath be 3 parts to this elbow grease on. First ly, I will be presenting and fend for 2 arguments that support my stand. Following that, Ill take into consideration near common objections against my thesis. Lastly, I will summarize the main points in this essay before drawing to a conclusion. The essays argument takes the form of Modus P wizns If GM is X, GM is wrongGM is X> GM is unethicalMy main argument is that it is unethical to tamper with disposition by salmagundi genes among the different species. By doing so, it may rattling suggestion to a impact of natural organisms intrinsic values. There is a very delicate fit that links this world together and this is the counterweight that makes things work. GM foods might in truth admit rise to more complications such as the disturbance of geniuss food pyramid.For example, the pesticide produced in the crop may unintentionally injury other creatures while producing a benefit to others. The introduction of pest-resistant genes into crops could lead to the conclusion of the pests and other animals causing an imbalance in the food chain that could maybe lead to the extinction of some species especially if they are only localised in one particular area.In Britain, a native evoke bird, the Skylark, was indirectly affected by the introduction of GM sugar beets that were intentional to resist herbicides. The result in planting this crop was that weeds were trim down substantially. However, since the birds rely on the seeds of this weed in autumn and winter, researchers expect that up to 80% of the Skylark population would take a crap to find other government agency of finding food. Another issue brought up is that GM crops may also pose a health risk to native animals that eat the plants and may be poisoned by the built-in pesticides.Although others might also argue that the discriminating down of trees to construct buildings might also be a way of tampering with nature, GM food not just tampers with physical nature but with the foundation of nature genes. Every organism, no matter how small, is make up of genes. These genes control the physical development and behavior of the organism and are passed down from parent to offspring. The word genes (comes from the Greek word genos meaning line of credit) actually defines natures transmission line and the production of GM food would mean to change the origin of nature.Furthermore, religious communities Christians, Hindus, Jews and Muslims also share such concerns regarding GM products. According to Bishop Jeff Davies from the SA Council of Churches, With genetic engineering, we are tampering with the structures of life that have taken millions of years to evolve and we have the arrogance to think that we merchantman improve on them in 10 years to transfer a gene from one species into another. Different religious communities have different believes and one of them would be their food such as kosher and halal food. nevertheless with the introduction of animal genes into plants how will they define a tomato with a fish gene? This will also be a major(ip) concern to vegetarians. All in all, I believe that people should be happy with what nature has to give and not play God and try to control nature. It is unethical to sacrifice other creatures and meddle with the delicate balance of nature. Furthermore, on that point will be potential chain reactions that may be unstoppable.One other argument is how GM products can affect our health especially in the long run. The unpredictable changes in our food could lead to negative reactions that are not detected by research techniques until much later. A quick acceptance of GE foods without proper interrogation could show corporate profitability to be very influential but that would be too dangerous because in that location has been no adequate safety testing to ensure that using other organisms genes is going to have the same useful effects if inserted into a totally unrelated species.Furthermore, testing has only been done on a small scale shortly and its hard to predict what will happen when its utilise on a wider ecology. In 1989, dozens of Americans died and several thousands were afflicted and impaired by a genetically altered version of the food postscript L-tryptophan. Studies have been done to show how viruses can mix with genes of other viruses to give rise to more deadly viruses. To mass market the use of GM food when it has not been properly tested for safety issues would mean that businesses are gaining at the expense of consumers health and is therefore ethically unacceptable.On the other hand, some organizations insist that GM engine room is the solution to settlement the problem of world longing. However, I feel that it is simply a dodge of corporations and countries that are using the plight of the developing world as a marketing strategy to gain acceptance of GE foods. GM technology is not an economical method that can be easily implement by most countries. I n fact, genetic engineering techniques are before long being applied to crops important to the industrialized world and not on crops which the worlds hungry depend on.GM foods could actually subjugate developed countries reliance on crops from developing countries, resulting in loss of wad and severe economic damage for them and intensifying their problem of poverty. This would mean that theres a conflict of interest. Furthermore, an important factor that Friends of the Earth has pointed out is that many people in the world are suffering from malnutrition and hunger because they cannot afford to buy food, not because it is unavailable. Therefore, even with GM food, people would stable not be able to afford it or have it distributed appropriately. around of the causes of hunger are found in global politics, rather than issues of floriculture and technology. As a result, a variety of groups and people are inquiring the motives behind GM foods as the political causes of hunger ap pear to be ignored.An article from Food First observed that most innovations in verdant biotechnology have been profit-driven rather than need-driven and it questions whether GE technology can real ensure food security, protect the environment and reduce poverty in the developing world or is it produced simply because its patentable and thus, profitable to businesses. In some cases, as reported by The Institute for Science, pesticide usage is actually increasing, and GE crop actually yield less than conventional crops.In this essay, I have come up with several valid reasons wherefore Genetically Modified Foods are ethically unacceptable. GM foods tamper with the origin of nature which is the genes and there is inadequate safety testing to prove that GM food is safe for human consumption.Therefore, businesses are mass marketing GM food at the expense of consumers health and proclaiming that GM Food is the solution to world hunger when it might not be true. Although there might be potential and benefits in GE technology, there are still many unknown areas that might prove to be more harmful then beneficial. Furthermore, there are still too many important ethical issues that have been ignored and that reason by itself makes it ethically unacceptable.